Skip to content Skip to sidebar Skip to footer

There Is No Must in Art Because Art Is Free

An Article by J. A. (634 words, 3 min. read)

Exploring artistic freedom and the constraints that limit it.

Wassily Kandinsky’s assertion that “there is no must in art because art is free” reflects his belief in the boundless nature of artistic creation. Yet how free are artists in reality? While art has the potential to be a space of liberation and self-expression, both internal and external pressures often limit this freedom.

Artistic Vision vs. Societal Expectations

Throughout history, societal norms have often challenged artistic freedom. Cubism, pioneered by Pablo Picasso and Georges Braque, rejected the traditional perspective-based approach that defined classical painting. Their fragmented, geometric forms shocked critics who accused them of undermining art itself. However, Picasso and Braque refused to conform, pushing art into a new era of abstraction.

Pablo Picasso

Surrealism, led by André Breton, René Magritte, and Salvador Dalì, was similarly revolutionary. Breton’s Surrealist Manifesto demanded art break free from rational thought and embrace the subconscious. However, Surrealists faced societal resistance, particularly when their works explored taboo themes. Magritte’s The Lovers, with its haunting image of two people kissing with their faces veiled, provoked discomfort and debate over hidden desires and identity.

André Breton
Commercialization and Market Demands

Even when avant-garde art movements gained acceptance, commercialization posed new challenges. Salvador Dalìs embrace of fame and commercial success was criticized by Breton, who accused him of betraying Surrealism’s ideals. Yet Dalì saw self-promotion as integral to his identity.

Gerhard Richter, often regarded as one of the most versatile painters of the modern era, has explored the tension between abstraction and realism throughout his career. Richter’s abstract works, such as those created using his signature squeegee technique, exemplify artistic freedom in their spontaneity and unpredictability. However, Richter’s refusal to adhere to one style also frustrated critics and collectors looking for consistency. His insistence on painting what felt authentic to him – whether photorealistic portraits or abstract canvases – demonstrates a deep commitment to artistic independence despite market pressures.

Gerhard Richter
Internal Barriers and Self-Censorship

Even in the absence of external pressures, self-imposed limits can restrict artistic freedom. Tracey Emin’s infamous My Bed, which displayed the artist’s actual unmade bed surrounded by personal objects, broke the boundary between private life and public art. Emin’s work was a raw expression of depression and self-doubt. Yet she faced both acclaim and ridicule, illustrating the price of emotional transparency in art.

Cy Twombly, with his graffiti-like marks and layered canvases, similarly embraced vulnerability in his work. His expressive, chaotic style was often dismissed as childish or unserious. However, Twombly’s refusal to conform to traditional aesthetics allowed him to create a deeply personal and raw visual language, embodying the spirit of artistic freedom Kandinsky championed.

Cy Twombly
Breaking Free: Embracing Courage and Authenticity

True artistic freedom lies in the willingness to follow one’s vision despite resistance. Jean-Michel Basquiat’s graffiti-inspired works challenged both the elitism of the art world and societal expectations about race and class. Although Basquiat faced pressure to conform as his fame grew, he continued to create art that was unapologetically bold and deeply personal.

Today, contemporary artists like Banksy continue this tradition of subverting expectations. Banksy’s satirical street art critiques political and social norms while remaining anonymous, resisting the commodification that often comes with fame. In this way, he expresses the spirit of Kandinsky’s declaration that art should be free from any “must”.

Striving Toward True Freedom

While Kandinsky’s belief in artistic freedom may seem idealistic, it remains a vital goal for many artists today. Navigating societal expectations, market pressures, and internal struggles is an ongoing challenge, but those who push past these constraints often produce the most transformative and courageous works. True artistic freedom is not about being free from all influences but about staying true to one’s vision in the face of them.